In a statistical representation, it would be an
abnormal distributional situation should all of Nigerians support and vote
President Jonathan come 2015; likewise would it be abnormal should the whole of
Nigeria vote against him. However, the normal distributional scenario would be
if 68.5% or (just around that figure) vote for or against him. If it falls down
to between 49-59%, it would still be considerable either way but in reality,
the President’s popularity as compared to 2011 the way things are right now in
Nigeria cannot give him up to 70% of the votes as made believe by TAN and other
groups supporting him. The reason for this shall be explained in the second
part of this article, coming up later in the week.
Right now, let’s explore what the average Nigerian term
or perceive as opposition. It is quite
evidenced with the many mud fights going on in our national space as we
approach 2015 general elections; that Nigerians (including the politicians) do
not understand what the basics of opposition politics entails. The manner at
which everybody seems to be hurling bricks at each other from across the divide
makes mockery of what we have made of democracy in Nigeria even after fifteen
years.
In simple terms, I think it is wise enough to reiterate
that there is no democracy without opposition and that any contradictions to
this notion means democracy is not in place in the system.
For some Nigerians including members of the ruling PDP,
the mentality is that any opposition to the government or the President is just
a scheme to discredit or bring down the President because of where he is from,
his religion or who is family, friends are. This is a wrong assertion. In the real context
of democracy as we have today in Nigeria, the PDP is as much an opposition to
the APC just as the APC is to the PDP.
Now just before some apologists of the PDP and the
President starts discrediting this article as a pro-APC article, let me quickly
be clear here that it is imperative that any one opposing this PDP led government must do so strictly on issues based discuss and not based on
malicious discrediting. Nobody should be allowed to hurl insults on the
President or his family just because they can. The number of physical abuses of
which President Jonathan has had to entertain since 2011 cannot be catalogued well
enough; and in my opinion it is undeserving of him or his family to be physically
subjected to insults by Nigerians no matter what. However, it becomes awkward
to defend this stand when aides of the President or people sentimentally
attached to his government go ghetto on the average critic of the
President to deflect away perceived faults of the President in administering
the Country. This surely, would bring negative acerbic attacks in retaliation.
Having said all these thus far, it is important to know
that the politics of opposition in a democracy operates in a circularly causal fashion. This simply means that the idea which operates
opposition politics in any existing democracy is a function of the type of politics
at play in the system at that given time.
In order words, in any given political system,
occurrences of a given time would usually generate sentiments amongst the
people and then polarize them into for
or against lines. Usually, this type
of practice is seen mostly in third world countries where political parties
lack prevailing driving ideologies or foundational political philosophies. Unlike in matured democracies like the US,
UK, France and Canada where accountability to the ideologues of political parties
are fundamental to societal reflections, most third world countries are still
drawn in the politics of basic needs which consequentially promotes violent
opposition.
In this day and age, no American Presidential or
British Premiership candidate would campaign on a what we call “stomach infrastructure” mantra and win.
But in Africa most especially Nigeria, campaigning on stomach
infrastructure is an integral part of a serious candidate’s slogan. If you
don’t promise Nigerians food or electricity during your campaign, then you
might as well forget being elected, that is if the election are not at all rigged
from source.
In the real context of this article, the elementary
question to ask is why is it that
President Jonathan is getting bashed left right and centre by the opposition in
Nigeria?
We may as well seek the answer from every country where
democracy is being practiced. Or better still; ask why Governors Fashola,
Ajimobi, Amosun and Oshiomole are being harangued by the PDP in their respective
States.
In most cases in a democracy, opposition thrives in the
many gaffes of the incumbent and we can hardly say the current incumbent has not
committed any gaffe since 2010. Worst still are the many aides of the President
who keeps attracting insults to their principal through gross incompetence and
corrupt ways. They have made the avenue of criticizing the President way more
than what can be patched all together,
thereby increasing the number of opposition for the President .
On the other hand, the opposition APC have not been really
that far from the politics of the PDP in contrast by way of operation. But rather
than condemning both parties, I think it is wise to just accept that both of
them are a reflection of the politics of the average Nigerian. Not until we can fashion out a well-entrenched,
deeply sourced people oriented democratic nodes upon which we can operate by
through the grassroots; parochial opposition
may just stay with us for a while to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment